Categories
Contemplation Life News Photography Uncategorized

Pullman Case Contemplation and Time Travel by Jim Martin

Smelling like old paper, film negatives and musty storage, a cloud of old memories slowly filled the air as I opened the venerable Pullman suitcase. Old family photographs, and other pictures I took, some a half a century ago, waited with negatives stored in protective sleeves. There were people, places and faces, including my own, stuck in time. The difficult part was being there in that moment again, retaking the picture or being in the photograph in that place and that time.8J4A0419Acamp

Is it possible to smell the heather and feel the morning breeze gently drifting off the English hills in the Lake District, all those years ago? The actual event can’t be relived, but the mind makes magic sometimes. The photograph acts as a visual reminder, conjuring up bits of experience from the archives in the mind, like an artist creating a painting. Wellington boots seen through a tent flap, “two bob” said the woman wearing the boots and  collecting the camping fees. This and other memories stored in the same picture.

A black and white picture, taken on a sunny day, of a friend and I standing next to a sports car I owned. The friend and the car are remembered. The city street we’re standing on looks familiar. What was the name of that street? Why were we there in suits and ties? Does the mind have a librarian checking the stacks for this event? It may take a while, but sometimes, a day or two later, the librarian pops up with the information. Events, places, and people in memory are abstract, subjective thoughts lost in context, perspective and time.8J4A03812ndmg

The object and the people in a photograph may bring back memories for some time after the picture was taken. How long the memory replays depends on how significant the event and how much attention it was given. Human imagination only needs a few clues to create what feels like a mountain breeze, the smell of a rose or a loved one’s touch. But everything the mind and body experiences in a lifetime is not remembered. In addition what is remembered is a subjective interpretation of the person or event, and so is the photograph.

No dates and places written on the backs of most photos. Still every picture has an inherent date and place in the past, my past and other people’s pasts even if it can’t be fully visited; reflections of a time and place that only exists there on the paper. The face on the paper is not my face anymore. The beautiful woman in the picture no longer looks or is the same. These things only existed for that photographic moment.8J4A0378TOM&...

I used to think that “I” was the sum of my experiences and memories. But this cannot be. The past is like those old photographs, moments frozen in time that do not exist beyond the shutter’s opening and closing. Here in the present, there is no past, no current me that remains from those pictures; every second this mind and body are changing. The body and mind in the picture no longer exist. Each memory is only a silent sketch, faded a bit more each day. The mind is like that old Pullman suitcase, stuffed full of folders with pictures, some in better shape than others, but all moments frozen in time. However, the mind, like the case may be opened occasionally for time travel to see the past, to imagine and perhaps explore those fleeting moments.

8J4A0389Wen

Written by James R (Jim) Martin, Author, Documentary Filmmaker, Photographer and student of  Mindfulness.

Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia: A Comprehensive Guide to Using Documentary Storytelling Techniques for Film, Video, the Internet and Digital Media Projects.

 

Categories
Contemplation Life News

The Buddhist Notion of Not Self and Modern Psychology by J R Martin

Wheel of Life
Wheel of Life

Is the Buddhist notion of “not self” a philosophy of life supported by modern psychological practice and scientific research?  Does self exist? The Buddhist interpretation of no self may sound nihilistic, but according to Buddhist thinking it is not.

The Buddha’s argument that there is no self has merit. There are only passing, sometimes random, feelings and thoughts. Any notion of self is rooted in past thoughts. Clinging to self is living in the past, like trying to drive a car forward by only looking in the rear view mirror. If there is no self, past, present and future are the products of conscious thinking.

According to Buddhist thought there is a construct of five aggregates that make up human existence, each area constantly changing, but together they appear to have continuity that is mistaken for a self. The five aggregates or “skandhas” are Consciousness (subjective awareness), Form (body), Feeling, Perception and Mental Formations.

In The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin writes about considering self as “causal connectedness.” There are twelve progressing links in the chain of “dependent arising,” each “conditions” the next link,” bringing about the whole of suffering. Each link “conditions” the rising of the next link. “…the concern is to show that physical and mental events occur in various relationships to each other.” – Gethin pg. 140-1

According to Buddha, there are only two things in life; there is only suffering (duhkha), or the cessation of suffering. He asks is suffering the self? This would seem to be the same as asking is “life” the self? In an exchange with the monks, who were his disciples, the Buddha challenges them, saying that you will not find self in the five aggregates of physical or mental events that define human existence. Looking at each of the five aggregates (skandhas), he submits that, everything happening in these five areas is temporary or impermanent. Things that are impermanent are considered as suffering (duhkha). Therefore they cannot be self.

Examining the five aggregates the Buddha, in his first discourse, asks the monks if the happenings in these areas are permanent or impermanent? He asks is pain the self? They reply, “no it is not.” Pain is impermanent. The Buddha asks, is it correct to consider something that will change as “this is mine, I am this, this my self?” The monks agree it is not. The Buddha concludes then, that we must say, “This is not mine, I am not this, this is not myself.” There is no self because it cannot be found anywhere within the five aggregates that define human life.

The underlying message here to the monks in a modern context is that they should stop “clinging or “grasping” these experiences in the five aggregates, as they do not need to own these experiences. This is not their identity. The Buddha was a teacher, and in a possibly therapeutic way, counseling the monks, who were obsessing or clinging to all their experiences as their identity, in fear that they would not attain enlightenment.

A modern therapist might ask a patient questions that actually parallel the five aggregates. For example:

“Is the feeling of pain you suffered as a child at the hands of other children, who you are?”

“No that pain isn’t who I am. Not me.”

“Is the resentment you feel toward your friend who you are?”

“I might feel resentful, but that’s not me.”

“What then is the point of clinging or holding on to these things?”

Using different language, not holding on to things that are impermanent because they are basis for suffering is a concept that seems to be a major part of modern psychological therapy. Buddhist teaching of no self allows the individual to summarily divorce traumatic experience, to stop “clinging” to pain and “grasping” suffering, leading to a cessation of suffering.

To Buddhists the five aggregates are all of existence. Experiences that happen in the aggregates are not you therefore there is no self. It should be noted however, since the Buddha apparently only said that the self was not found in the five aggregates, that he might not have been saying that it did not exist at all. There is a movement around the Buddha’s thinking that acknowledges no self,  but at the same time, recognizes universal consciousness. Meditation brings us into contact with our true collective self.

© 2015 James R Martin

Sources:

Robert Wright — Buddhism and Modern Psychology – All Video lectures, Weeks 1-3.

Rupert Gethin –The Foundations of Buddhism –Chapter 6

Bikkhu Bodhi — lectures on the eightfold path and meditation (lectures 7 and 8: http://www.buddhanet.net/audio-lectures.htm)

 

Categories
Film News

American Experience: Walt Disney — Review by Jim Martin

American-Experience-Walt-Disney-to-Premiere-on-PBS

The PBS – American Experience: Walt Disney documentary provides an uncensored, well researched, exploration of Walt Disney, the man, his work, and his passion for achieving goals.  The 221 minute documentary looks into Walt Disney’s contributions to the art of film, his strengths and weaknesses.  The film examines Disney’s great insight into American culture and at other times his opaque insensitivity to historical, political and social issues facing Americans. Walt Disney was an artist and an entrepreneur, greatly aided in his goals by Roy Disney, his brother, who complemented Walt’s obsessive personality with practical nuance.

American Experience: Walt Disney informs and entertains.   It is a great biography of Disney and the development of animated feature films. From a historical filmmaking point of view the documentary is a treasure trove of information, enhanced by the unlimited access given American Experience, to the Disney historical archives. There are photographs, and documentary footage of Walt Disney though out his life. Disney seemed to have someone there taking pictures or shooting activities all the time. The film’s narrative structure is greatly enhanced by this visual actuality of these events. Interviews with those people who knew Walt Disney also help tell the story. There is a linear chronology of Walt Disney’s life contrasted with events around him. Clips from classic Disney films are included throughout the documentary.Disney cover

Walt Disney’s early attempts at creating short cartoons for distribution ultimately lead to Mickey Mouse; demonstrating Disney’s innovation including the first use of audio for an animated short. These early scenes in the documentary may be of particular interest to aspiring filmmakers as well as Disney fans.

One of the most interesting aspects of the documentary is Walt Disney’s idea to create a feature-length animated film that was Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. Because of Disney’s determination to create a perfect, artistic film that transcended the notion that animationsnowwhite was only for cartoons, Snow White took five years to make and greatly exceeded its original budget. When it was finally released it was a huge national and international success. It achieved all that Disney intended, except winning an Oscar for Best Film.  It did win an Oscar for innovation which didn’t really meet Disney’s expectations.

American Experience: Walt Disney is set up in two parts that total four hours. It is well-edited and does not lag or get redundant. In fact there seems to be a pick-up of pace in the last hour to cover  Disney Land creation, it’s success, the beginnings of Epcot, Disney World in Florida and Walt’s untimely death at age 65 from Lung Cancer. This is a biographical film about Walt Disney; however, it might have included more about his brother and alter ego Roy Disney. This is not to say Roy’s important role in Walt Disney’s life is ignored. It’s that Roy seems to always be in the shadows making things happen and trying to rein in his brother. It would have been interesting to know more about Roy and how he accomplished these things. Perhaps Roy Disney is another story.

The documentary does not gloss over Walt Disney’s problems with his employees, unions, his obsession with communists everywhere, or his insensitivity to minorities and racial stereotypes like those seen in Song of the South and other Disney films, television programs and other endeavors. In many ways it seems from watching the documentary that Walt Disney mirrored the cultural biases of his generation.

 American Experience: Walt Disney does what an excellent biographical documentary should do. It explores reality, in this case the life of Walt Disney, with the goal of understanding who he was as a person and what he created during his lifetime. The successes, the failures and personality traits of a creative human being in the context of the world they lived in.

 American Experience: Walt Disney aired on PBS in mid September 2015. It is available on Apple TV, PBS online and on DVD from PBS and Amazon.

Review by James R (Jim) Martin – Documentary Filmmaker and Author

Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia: A Comprehensive Guide to Using Documentary Storytelling Techniques for Film, Video, the Internet and Digital Media Projects.

Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPNOBBoZqIo

 

DVD

American Experience: Walt Disney

Review also appears on jrmartinmedia.com

Categories
Contemplation Life News

Our Stories as Defense Sytems

Self-Care, Mindfulness & The Mind/Body Connection

for Helping Professionals

Mini Retreat & Support Group for MSWs, Coaches, Educators & Helping Professionals

For more information use link below.

Self-Care, Mindfulness & The Mind-Body Connection for Helping Professionals(1)

 

Categories
News Observations Politics

Donald Trump Show – Spin, Frame, False Equivalency

trump
Illustration Donald Honkey

Donald Trump, as he conducts his wrestling show run for the Presidency of the United States, is entertaining to many people. In a perverse way politics and Trump have become a comedy reality show. Watching Trump’s altercation with Univision reporter Jorge Ramos on August 25, 2015, may have given the public a brief glimpse into the narcissistic, pathological  mind of Mr. Trump, not so obviously seen in public up until now.

Jorge Ramos knew he would need to ask his question and hold his ground because Trump had refused to talk to him previously. Trump did not answer the question being asked, instead he showed disdain for the reporter dismissing Ramos in a demeaning fashion. Trump then had his bodyguards physically manhandle and push the reporter out of the room. Outside one of the bodyguards can be heard telling Ramos, an American citizen, to go back to Mexico. Other reporters in the room asked Trump why he wouldn’t answer Ramos’s question and had Mr. Ramos removed. Trump quickly tried to paint Ramos, a respected, veteran reporter, as out-of-order and crazy.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2Z7k75SnN4

(This video showing Trump telling is people to throw the reporter out etc has been removed from YouTube.)

Trump appears to be a natural at “Framing” arguments, “Spin,” and “False Equivalency” posturing. First he frames his argument or answer to any question on his own terms. This often includes a “False Equivalency” comparison. In a pathological moment, he then believes what he spins is true.

One of the bogus arguments in defense of Trump’s behavior at this press conference is to compare his actions with the reporter, to being appropriate and not like Bernie Sanders’ reaction to the “Black Lives Matter” protesters that confronted Sanders at a rally. Since Trump has publicly stated that he would never be like Bernie Sanders and give up the stage to protesters it is likely Trump over reacted to Ramos to prove, once again, how strong and tough he is. The only thing Trump needed afterward, was to present Ramos as an unreasonable interloper.

But the situations were totally different. This is a false equivalency frame. Ramos was not a protester; he is a serious, credentialed Univision reporter, asking a question, at a news conference. Trump’s current animosity to Univision, he’s suing them for not running his Beauty Pageant show, also played a part. After Trump had Ramos removed from the room, he was asked why by other reporters. Trump’s response was to immediately spin that Ramos was “screaming,” and out-of-order. The video of the confrontation shows something else.   Ramos did not have a microphone, so he may have been speaking louder than normal to be heard, not screaming. Screaming implies, emotional hysteria, a spin word to make Ramos appear irrational or angry, and the belligerent, annoyed Trump as rational. Trump’s reaction to reporters after Ramos was ejected was pathological lying, not just spinning.

Photo: Univision reporter Jorge Ramos (L) is escorted from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s news conference before his “Make America Great Again Rally” at the Grand River Center in Dubuque, Iowa, Tuesday, August 25, 2015. REUTERS/Ben Brewer
Photo: Univision reporter Jorge Ramos (L) is escorted from Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s news conference before his “Make America Great Again Rally” at the Grand River Center in Dubuque, Iowa, Tuesday, August 25, 2015. REUTERS/Ben Brewer

As far as Bernie Sanders and the protestors are concerned, Sanders appears to actually share the concerns of the protesters. He has been active in all sorts of civil rights activities his entire political career. Instead of creating a confrontation with protesters he simply gave them a chance to speak their minds. This was not a sign of weakness; it was a sign of strength, good will, judgement and experience. In his confrontation with Jorge Ramos Trump has, as he did with Megan Kelly, demonstrated once again his own insecurity and pathological nature.

The Republican establishment would like Donald Trump to self-destruct or go away because he bluntly campaigns on all the “dog whistle” rhetoric the Republicans have been using to manipulate voters. The majority of these issues are fear, race, religious or ethnic based concerns. Trump attacks and scapegoats immigrants unfiltered at the same time as he advocates hedge fund brokers paying their fare share of taxes. He has plugged in to all the gripes Americans have both left and right. If the Republicans outright dump him he could run as a third-party candidate. His support would come from all the, mainly white, voters who feel disenfranchised based on all the right-wing propaganda they have been fed by Republicans.  But the right-wing, along with Fox News, has mounted a campaign against Trump. Democrats don’t want to help them too much at this point since they believe they have a strong candidate in Hillary Clinton or someone else, and that Americans wouldn’t really vote for  Donald Trump.

It is possible that the best-case scenario for Trump to actually become President would be to run as a third-party candidate and pull his majority from both parties. Moderate Republicans and Democrats either don’t vote or protest vote for Trump. Libertarians, New Regan Democrats, NRA supporters, Christian Fundamentalist, Anti Abortion, Tea Party and White Supremacist form the base of the third-party. At this point support comes in from Koch Brothers groups hoping to partner somehow with Trump. Trump campaigns on issues that are real or imagined, with grandiose solutions that are pure fantasy, like building a nineteen hundred mile wall along the border with Mexico and getting them to pay for it.

Thinking Donald Trump is only entertainment and that he really doesn’t “have a chance,” if he becomes the candidate, should be reconsidered. Going back over the years in other countries, there have been unlikely leaders who emerge on issues scapegoating minorities or perceived groups like immigrants. We think that here in the United States we have too many checks and balances for anything like a dictator to emerge. Many of these checks and balances have been or are being eroded by the far right. The right of all citizens to vote, separation of church and state, and women’s rights are among the many being curtailed by factions of the Republican Party.

The steps that any administration would need to take to deport eleven million immigrants would necessitate totalitarian policies. It would promote American pogroms against groups that are suspected of being or harboring immigrants. Documented immigrants, recent American Citizens, Latin, Asian, Black and Middle Eastern looking people would be harassed. The disorder that results could lead to martial law.

Donald Trump knows how to entertain and play a part. His act is brash, pushy, egotistical, tell-it-like-he thinks-it-is, and faux entrepreneur. But those qualities are also those of a narcissistic psychopathic bully. These traits were clearly demonstrated during the Jorge Ramos confrontation if you watch Trump’s  posture, face and listen to is voice during the exchange.   Proceed with caution.

James R Martin, Documentary Filmmaker.

Categories
Arts Film News

Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief

jHubbard
L. Ron Hubbard

“A civilization without insanity, without war, where the able can prosper and honest beings can have rights, and where man is free to rise to greater heights, are the aims of Scientology.” –L. Ron Hubbard

The Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief documentary is based on a book written by Lawrence Wright, titled Going Clear: “Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief.” Scientology objects to the book and the documentary. As recently reported (8.5.2015) by the Guardian: the church, from its Los Angeles HQ, has denounced the film as a “one-sided, bigoted propaganda built on falsehoods” and informed by former members – whom it calls “misfits”.

In April, the church said in a statement: “The Church of Scientology will be entitled to seek the protection of both UK and Irish libel laws in the event that any false or defamatory content in this film is broadcast within these jurisdictions.”

Going Clear is a well-made film. Good editing and use of archival material and interviews. There is a lot of footage of Scientology events and places. Scientology officially calls it “propaganda.” But that label is not appropriate unless it can be shown that the filmmakers are misrepresenting the truth and hiding their true point-of-view (POV). A documentary film is not propaganda simply because you don’t agree with it’s premise or reality. One definition of a propaganda film is that is was made by a government, with a political philosophy or by an institution with a mission. Going Clear does not meet these criteria.

See the full Review and Trailer for this HBO documentary film at:  JRMartinMedia.com

Categories
News Reading Travel

Turn Right At Machu Picchu – Rediscovering the Lost City One Step at a Time

cover turnrightMachu Picchu is one of those places I’ve always wanted to visit. While in the Army, Leon, and I went to the Boston Library and started researching a possible journey we could take when our enlistments were up. We were researching the Inca Trail and Machu Picchu. Of course we soon discovered that there was a train that went along the Inca Trail or to Machu Picchu.  This took some of the adventure out of the idea. I think we thought the Inca treasure might still be out there.

Reading Mark Adams book Turn Right at Machu Picchu, all these years later has brought back not only the sense of adventure but also, after reading the book, a feeling that I’ve been there. Documentaries (nonfiction stories) come in all forms. Adams takes you step-by-step through his own experience and the history of Peru as it relates to the Inca civilization, the Inca Trail, Machu Picchu and other ruins in the area. The Inca civilization itself didn’t last that long, especially after the Spanish arrived in 1532. But the indigenous people of the Peruvian Andes, who speak Quechua, still live in the area around Cuzco and Machu Picchu.Machu Picchu1

Binghamiii A
Hiram Bingham III

A major part of the story evolves around Hiram Bingham III, who in 1911 basically brought Machu Picchu into the limelight along with the notion that it was the Lost City to which some of the Inca’s, with their Gold and Silver treasures, retreated from the Spaniards. In 1913 National  Geographic featured Bingham’s travels in one edition that brought Machu Picchu, Bingham and National Geographic into prominence.  Bingham was a controversial character and went on later expeditions to Peru. According to Adams he may have been the inspiration for Indiana Jones character in Raiders of the Lost Ark. Adams layers the historical facts with his travel progress so that the book has a narrative cinematic quality. There are some well-drawn maps and black and white photographs included in the book. There is also a glossary that helps with pronunciation of some of the Quechua (Ketch-wah) names.

Mark&John
Mark Adams and John Leivers

Adams writes he “wanted to retrace Bingham’s route through the Andes on the way to discovering Machu Picchu” along with looking at other important locations.  Turn Right at Machu Picchu is more than one man’s journey of exploration and discovery. It leaves you with a feeling that you’ve gone along on this adventure, done the research, heard the many stories, met the intrepid guide, John Leivers, who’s experience makes the journey possible, hiked the mountains, hiked the Inca roads and seen the awesome Apu (mountain) views. There’s also a supporting cast of characters including local Peruvian mule handlers, cooks and others.

Turn Right at Machu Picchu offers new appreciation and insights into Inca architectural and astronomical accomplishments. The Inca employed a method of building with stone and granite that, without the use mortar,  brought the blocks together as flush as any modern building. The built hundreds of miles of small stone paved roads up and down mountains that connected various parts of their dominion. They aligned their cities by the stars and had buildings with windows that would capture the solstices on the appropriate days.

Inca Trail
Inca Trail

If you are planning a trip to Peru, Machu Picchu and the Inca Trail, Turn Right At Machu Picchu is a must read and might be something to stuff into your back pack. You can also be an armchair adventurer, this book will make you feel like you are there. No need for a TV, the words create the pictures.

Review by James R Martin – Author Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia

 

 

Daily Show Interview with Mark Adams

http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/1tlapy/mark-adams

 

Turn Right at Machu Picchu: Rediscovering the Lost City One Step at a Time

 

Create Documentary Films, Videos and Multimedia: A Comprehensive Guide to Using Documentary Storytelling Techniques for Film, Video, the Internet and Digital Media Projects.

Categories
Arts Film Fine Arts News

LEVITATED MASS REVIEW

81i9GIK8lgL._SX522_

Levitated Mass directed by Doug Pray is a documentary that has appeal as an adventure story, exploration of the place of monumental art in America, the work of an artist with and alternative view of space and time, and it all revolves around a 900 million year old rock. Levitated Mass is the saga and implementation of  an idea originally envisioned in 1968 by artist Michael Heizer.

Levitated Mass is a well-made documentary that both informs and entertains. Doug Pray’s previous documentaries include “Yelp.” “”Scratch,” “Big Rig,” and “Art & Copy” among others. Levitated Mass will keep you involved and finding answers to questions you may come up with while watching. This is a story about many things including art and how it relates to life for the artist and the audience.

Full Review at J R Martin Mediahttp://www.jrmartinmedia.com/documentary/levitated-mass/

Categories
Life News

A Bank Where The Customer is Always Wrong

Abusive Surveillance and Invasion of Personal Privacy and Freedom.

[box] How much personal privacy and freedom are we willing to give up in this increasingly militarized, “Big Brother is Watching You” world?   Will going to a bank or store soon be like air travel? An individual should be able to walk about, go into a store, bank or retail outlet and not have to identify themselves or have his or her image recorded without his or her consent.[/box]

Don’t walk into the Regions Bank in Winter Park, Florida wearing a baseball cap and sunglasses along with whatever else you choose to wear. A rude teller will ask you to remove the hat and glasses and refuse to take your money until you do so.  You may be offered the option to turn your cap around backwards. Not sure if you can take the cap off and keep wearing the sunglasses or take the sunglasses off and not turn the hat around. So far it’s only  hats and glasses that are problematic. My concern  goes beyond the mere inconvenience of removing clothing or eye glasses.  Why  should ordinary people  be subject to treatment, as if they were suspected of being criminals, because of what they’re wearing; let alone as a customer in a bank or retail store? Why suddenly all the increased, so-called, security? Is everyday life going to be like air travel? How much data do corporations need about our  activities and whereabouts? When you look closely you may find corporations and businesses are gathering more information about you than the government ever does.

Dressed casually, golf type shirt and jeans I entered the Regions Bank Branch on Aloma Avenue in Winter Park, Florida to make a deposit, which is all I was carrying in my hand as I walked up to totally enclosed, bullet proof teller’s area. Perhaps it was my thinning, close-cropped, mostly silver beard that frightened the teller. There were no other customers in the bank; just two tellers behind the enclosure and a manager somewhere hidden away.

“You must remove your hat and sunglasses or turn your hat around backwards and remove the glasses,” or something like that is what I heard from the scowling teller. “Why do I have to do that,” I asked? “It’s the rules, the Sheriff’s department sign is there by entrance,” she whined.[box type=”info”] This is my local branch bank where the teller should say, “HI Mr. Martin, how can we help you today?” Not, “up against the wall, take off your hat and glasses, you might be a criminal today.”[/box]

I became irate. “This is profiling, harassment and invasion of privacy I said. I do not wish to remove my hat and glasses. Please process the deposit in your hand,” I stated firmly.

“I won’t process it until you remove your hat and glasses,” she demanded. “You have to remove them and keep them off,” she repeated after I took off my glasses and hat and then put them back on.

Meanwhile the other teller appeared in the space next to this teller. It was not the usual teller that I go to and have chatted with for years. I have previously spoken with the teller who was refusing to serve me until I removed my hat and glasses. She had to have seen me at the bank as a regular customer before. There was no pressing need for her to ask me to remove my hat and sunglasses and keep them off.

“Look this is absurd. I come to this branch all the time; you have my name on the deposit slip and my cash in your hand. I have no weapons or places I could conceal a weapon. I want the name of the manager and your name because I’m going to report this as customer harassment. This is profiling me because I’m wearing a baseball cap and sunglasses. I need the hat to protect my head and the glasses to see and to protect my eyes, especially the right eye which is recovering from detached retina surgery. “

Katie Tilley the teller would not process my deposit. I took off my hat and sunglasses and she finally processed the transaction. By this time Elizabeth Velez, Assistant Vice President, Branch Manager appeared from her lair, wherever that might have been in the lobby.

We went through all the same conversation I had already been through with Tilley the Teller.

“You know I’ve been coming to this bank for at least five years, no one has ever asked me to take off my hat or my sunglasses. Tilley is harassing me, because of some obscure policy and perhaps because of the way I look ethnically. I have no recourse but to strongly consider closing my three accounts with this bank”

I got my deposit receipt and left the bank, promising to never return and that I would be reporting this to the bank as having been harassed by the tellers and the Branch Manager. Why, I thought, was I upset over this incident?

For me the bottom line is that banks do not have the right to invade their customer’s privacy by forcing them to remove their hats and glasses when they come into the bank. What’s next a “pat down,” “strip search” or “body scan?” This is an infringement on our freedom to wear what we feel like wearing when going to the bank. In the name of “security” we gave up personal space and privacy for air travel.  Since that time businesses, corporations, banks and government agencies have been chipping away at individual privacy. When did we sign off on having our every move under surveillance and recorded?  Next the convenient store/gas station will ask us to remove our hats and sunglasses so they can get a better recording.  All for “our protection.”

Yes I do have the right to take my business elsewhere, but there is a growing trend amongst banks, and other retail establishments to put so-called security measures into place that infringe on the privacy of the customer. The only reason to remove the hat and glasses is so that the bank’s surveillance cameras can record your image without your permission. An individual should be able to walk about, go into a store, bank or retail outlet and not have to identify himself or have his image recorded without his consent. I don’t remember signing a release form to Regions Bank saying they could record my image for any reason.

I sent a complaint to the customer service contact address on the Regions Bank Website. Saying much of what I’ve written here. The reply from Alicia, Customer Service Representative, was predictable. “The bank policy simply provides you with greater protection when visiting a branch location… …helps law enforcement officials identify the offending party… “ I was the only customer in the bank and I was making a simple deposit to a teller, enclosed in bulletproof enclosure. Taking off my hat and sunglasses does not protect me from a bank robber or consumer  fraud or was  I the “offender.”

“If someone tried to impersonate you with your driver’s license, the teller could better compare you with your picture.” Okay, I might agree, if I was unknown to the teller and was asked to present an ID to cash a check or make a withdrawal. My wearing of a hat and sunglasses was of no concern to my making a small cash deposit to my personal checking account. Dressed as I was, it was not possible I was concealing anything. This is my local branch bank where the teller should say, “HI Mr. Martin, how can we help you today?” Not, “take off your hat and glasses, you might be a criminal today.”

Regions Bank Policy is customer harassment. It is an excuse to profile certain individuals who the bank deems suspicious. It has nothing to do with customer protection. The only other place I’ve experienced this is in banks in Costa Rica, where everyone entering the bank goes through a metal detector, may be searched and must take off sunglasses and at least turn a hat with a brim backward. Is this what’s next for Regions Bank? Is this what’s coming to a Bank or Big Box store near you? Don’t be surprised if you find yourself being told you can’t wear a hat and sunglasses in Costco or Target next.

J R Martin

Categories
Arts News Poetry

MORNING TIME

IMG_0043A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life is not a simple

choice between

deciding yes or no,

picking black or white.

There, hidden 

among the many

shades of gray, lies

a journey through

cascading colors,

inspirational ideas,

challenging choices,

lusty loves,

possible paths

twists, turns,

secret sounds

magical music,

and those mystical

moments that no

words dare describe.

JRM